An Agreement Is Lawful Unless It

a) A agrees to sell his house to B for 10,000 rupees. Here is B`s promise to pay the sum of 10,000 rupees, the consideration for A`s promise to sell the house, and A`s promise to sell the house is the counterpart of Bes` promise to pay the 10,000 rupees. These are legitimate considerations. The words “if they are allowed to destroy the legal provisions” must be interpreted as referring to the implementation of an agreement that necessarily results in the overstay of the provisions of a statute. The general rule of law, as applied by the courts, is based on the exception of the maxim modus and conventio vincunt legem11. In other words, if the explicit provisions of a law are violated by a contract, the interests of the parties or third parties would be affected by their performance. The contracting parties have the power to settle their rights and undertakings themselves and the Tribunal only takes into force the intention of the parties as set out in the contract, in accordance with the laws of the country in force. 1] Prohibited by law If the purpose of a contract or the examination of a contract is prohibited by law, they are no longer a legal consideration or an object. They then become illegal. Thus, such a contract can no longer be valid. Among the illegal objects of protest are acts punishable by law. These include those that prohibit the competent authorities by rules and regulations. But if the rules adopted by these authorities are not linked to the law, they will not apply.

(c) (c) for a specified amount paid to it by B, if it is destroyed during a given journey, if it is destroyed, if it is destroyed. Here is the promise of A payment counterparty B, and B payment is the counterpart of A Promise, and these are legitimate considerations. In accordance with the provisions of Section 23, an agreement involving the violation of a person or the assets of a third party is null and void and cannot be invoked by court, so that no right to violate such an illegal agreement can be considered bearable. (g) A agrees to sell a horse worth 1,000 to 10 Rs. A disputes that his consent to the agreement was disclosed. The term “object” used in section 23 means “object” and does not make sense in the same sense as “reflection.” For this reason, the consideration of a contract may be legal and real, but this will not prevent the contract from being illegal if the purpose (object) of the contract is illegal. Section 23 limits jurisdictions to the purpose of the agreement or the transaction itself, as the section is not motivated by the motive, and not to the motives that flow from it. (i) A`s estate is sold for the proceeds of the delay, under a statutory law prohibiting the late acquisition of the estate. B becomes buyer after agreement with A and agrees to pass on the estate has. I .C to A after receiving the price he paid.